Archive for October, 2009

New web site www.Mash.ie

For those of you following me on Twitter, you would have heard me going on about a new web site that I’m writing called Mash.ie.  Essentially, this web site is another idea I have of making teachers’ lives a little easier, including my own.  Now, Mash.ie is not up and running yet.  It’ll take another few weeks before I want to unleash it on the public so I’ve set up a fun pre-launch.

Essentially, I’d like as many recipes for mashed potatoes as I can.  So far I’ve received some lovely colcannon recipes and, oddly, one for apple pie.  There is, of course, a method to my madness.  All the recipes will be used in some way for the web site when it does go public.

Mash.ie is going to be a lesson plan/theme database that will be updated by its members, (that’s you guys!)  I’m looking for some lesson plan themes to start me off.  If you have any ideas, I’ll sign you up as a member and credit you.  Eventually the idea will be to reward anyone who posts on to the web site so it should be worth your while.  I’ll post up information on how to do this in a while.

Why I’m voting “no” to strike action

Everyone knows that we’re in the middle of a recession: everyone, that is, except for the INTO, the union representing Irish primary school teachers.

The McCarthy report outlined several ways that the government could save some cash in the education sector. None of the recommendations included a pay cut. However, the INTO are convincing its members that as well as the terms of the McCarthy report, we will also get another cut in our pay.

I believe we have been given an opportunity for negotiation. Should the INTO have the ability to do so, rather than refusing point-blank to accept any of the recommendations for cuts in the report, why don’t they use it as a bargaining tool against pay cuts? The advantage of this is that teachers may be seen in a more positive light by the public. No one could accuse us of not putting our “shoulder to the wheel” or “take some of the pain”.

The INTO are feeding the message that the media are giving to the general public that teachers are only interested in protecting themselves and essentially are self-serving.

Rather than threatening a strike now, here’s a chance for the INTO to take on some of the cutbacks to show our commitment to helping our economy. Let’s look at some of the things, we as teachers could live with. I’ve also added a couple of my own ideas and those of other teachers I’ve spoken to.

Staying an extra hour after school each day: Most of us do this anyway and the public will see that at last. Cost to us? Nothing.

Getting rid of A & B posts: Why not share all responsibilities out amongst the staff? A & B posts only cause an inevitable and unhelpful hierarchy in schools. Saving to the government: €67m. Saving to teachers: No hierarchal system.

Getting rid of EPV days: As nice as it was to be able to take a couple of days off during the school year, it was always a pain in the ass for the teachers left behind with a chunk of the missing teacher’s class. No substitution cover meant that there was little benefit to the school overall. Anyway, we could do courses during our extra hour in school. Saving to government: €0. Cost to teachers: €0. Cost to our public image: Very high. For some reason, we are being targeted in a negative way for this.

Lowering the number of uncertified sick days from 31: Let’s bring it all the way down to one or two… even zero. We don’t get substitute cover for the first day so most schools are asking teachers to get certificates anyway. Savings to the government: roughly €0. Cost to our public image: priceless. We’re being dragged through the mud for this despite the fact that only 3 or 4 teachers out of 30,000 took advantage.

Call the bluff of amalgamating schools: So, where are the government going to get the money to do this? I doubt it’s going to happen any time soon and they’ll be out of power a long time before they’d have the chance to do it. Cost to the government: their reputation. Cost to schools: It’s not really going to happen in this climate.

Reduce allocation to teacher training colleges: As long as it’s across the board, why not? It’s all about supply and demand. Savings to government: a few million euro. Savings to teachers: A hell of a lot of envelopes and stamps.

Absorb the NEWB into the Department of Education: To be fair, they don’t act on any of the absences.

Absorb the NCSE into the Department of Education: I can’t see any reason for this to be a separate agency.

Reduce the numbers in the Inspectorate: Until the inspectorate become an independent body with actual power, they are a pointless bureaucratic agency. While WSEs seem to still scare teachers, in reality they are meaningless exercises in ticking boxes.

Scrap the Teaching Council: I think it goes without saying that this is the most pointless of all agencies in the Irish education system.

Make all Communication electronic: I receive at least one envelope from the DES per week. Some of them are stamped with 55c but mostly they’re at least 95c. If there’s a glossy booklet inside, it’s going to be at least €1.27 for the stamp. Naturally, they also send an equivalent envelope to my chairperson. Oh.. we’d better not forget the price of printing letters, booklets and then doing it twice, once in English and once in Irish. Let’s say on average it costs 95c per week to send letters to a school, (I’m being incredibly generous). So… 95c x 30,000 schools x 52 weeks = €1.482m. Adding glossy books, CDs, etc. I would imagine it costs well over €10m per annum for this kind of stuff. If they just popped it on the web site or emailed the schools, the cost would be considerably lower. In fact, it might cost zero instead.

Change the grants structure: Not only would this save money, it would free schools up to spend their money according to their own priorities. It would also get rid of the need for pointless staff in the DES.

Ban Prefabs: If a school is full, either build a new school or build an extension. Renting prefabs, as we all know, is costing the government millions every year and no-one is happy about it except for the prefab companies.

Anyway, I think that’s quite enough for now. The government will probably save enough money there to protect our children’s education. By offering some of these things in return for no further cutbacks, the INTO will be showing leadership. They will be showing the public that one part of the public sector is willing to take a bit of pain. Then, after all this, if the government decide to carry on chopping teaching and SNA posts, then I’ll be ready to hold up my picket sign. Until the INTO decide to compromise in difficult economic times, I cannot give them a mandate to strike.

A Nail in the Coffin for Online Applications

onlineapps

I decided I’d go about asking the powers that be about online application forms for teaching posts.  My intention for next year was to do this when hiring our next teacher.  I rang the INTO and CPSMA. Basically the story is that we can’t do the online application thing.  Technically we shouldn’t be even accepting email applications. It states in the guidelines:

“The advertisement shall invite applications with curriculum vitae”
“That applicants should mark envelope ‘Application’;”
“that a curriculum vitae must be submitted with the application” (CPSMA Handbook, p65)

Both the INTO and CPSMA people I spoke to were in favour of my proposals but said that they weren’t really even thinking about it.  Eileen Flynn mentioned that even though it’s common practice in every other sector, what I’ve proposed is way ahead of its time for the teaching sector.

So, unless things change before the summer, it looks as if my board and I will be sifting through hundreds of envelopes again and potential employees will be spending hundreds of euro on envelopes and stamps whilst destroying several forests.

CESI National Conference 2010

CESI National Conference
“Creative Technology in Challenging Times”
12th and 13th February 2010

At the 2010 Computers in Education Society of Ireland’s (CESI) Annual Conference, we plan to highlight the varied and creative ways teachers are using ICT to enhance teaching and learning at primary and post primary level. In that spirit, the theme for this year’s conference is “Creative Technology in Challenging Times”. Attendance at the conference is open to all teachers whether experienced or not in the use of ICT.

CESI welcomes presenters for the conference from primary, post primary and third level education. Presentations should be 30 minutes in length. Workshops should be 60 minutes in length. A full list of last year’s presentations and workshops can be viewed at www.cesi.ie/conference.

If you are interested in presenting at the conference, please email your proposal consisting of the following:

  • Presentation or workshop title
  • A brief description of the presentation / workshop, including target audience
  • Any special equipment that might be needed for the presentation / workshop
  • Complete contact information
  • Brief biography

to conference@cesi.ie on or before Thursday, 12th November. In turn CESI will respond to each proposal by Friday, 27th November.

The selection of presentations / workshops will be made in the interests of good balance.

Respectively,

Tom Kendall & Adrienne Webb, CESI Co-Chairs

CESI, founded in 1973, promotes the use of ICT in education at all levels in the Irish Education System. It is a voluntary body that draws its members from primary, post primary and third level teachers.

The CESI Conference is generously supported by Teacher Professional Networks, http://www.tpnetwork.ie/ and the National Centre for Technology in Education, www.ncte.ie

Prim-Ed are selling Interactive Whiteboards again!

Prim-Ed are selling Interactive Whiteboards again.   In a call to Anseo.net, marketing manager Jessica Murphy, revealed that Prim-Ed will be distributing two different kinds of Interactive Whiteboard aimed at different users.

Up until recently, Prim-Ed were the exclusive distributors of Promethean Interactive Whiteboards.  Earlier in the year, Clarity bought over these rights and Prim-Ed no longer supported or sold Promethean boards.  In September, Anseo.net broke the news that unless people has bought their board from a reseller, they would have to ring a UK phone number for support.  I spoke to the marketing heads of Prim-Ed at the time and they said they were looking into distributing a new IWB.

Today I received a call from the marketing team at Prim-Ed with a preview of their new boards.

Prim-Ed will now sell two different types of boards.  One will be familiar to many of this web site’s readers and the other is a new name for me.

The first board is the Hitachi Starboard.  I have been pioneering these boards as the best quality on the market for a long time.  Apart from this web site, Prim-Ed researched a number of schools who have purchased this board, and feedback is overwhelmingly positive.  Prim-Ed will now be able to offer an IWB that offers a touch-based interface, unlike the Promethean board, which relies on a pen for input.  Another advantage of the Hitachi board is that it doubles up as a normal dry-wipe board so teachers can use whiteboard markers on them.  The software that comes with the Hitachi board  is quite good and it also comes with some decent software.  There’s a few other neat tricks with the Hitachi board, such as multiple users and dual touch – (I call it the Minority Report effect).

The other board is their “budget” option.  It’s called the Genee Board and it reminds me very much of an eBeam style IWB.  It uses the same technology and you’ll find a lot of similar boards like it, e.g. Vosa board, 3M board and Rainbow IWB.  I haven’t seen the software that comes with it but my guess is that it will be slightly better than the norm.

Pricewise, the Genee Board is coming in at €2,500 for a long-throw projector solution and €3,000 for a short-throw projector.  The Hitachi Starboard comes in at €3,600 for a short-throw solution and €4,000 for a fully motorised, height-adjustable system.

It’s great to see Prim-Ed back in the IWB race and it will be interesting to see how successful they are with a new board considering the reputation they built up with the Promethean Boards.  What they have now in the Hitachi board is one of the best quality IWBs on the market.  Will they be able to convert their previous customers?  I hope so.

Another company taking your old mobiles…

Old mobile phones must be worth a fortune!  Everyone from charities to businesses are looking for old mobiles, which they’ll happily trade in for new stuff.  400 phones can now get you an interactive whiteboard.  Most fully kitted out Interactive Whiteboards cost around €2,000 before companies stick their profits on so your old mobile must be worth at least a fiver, probably more.  Anyway, Liosdoire are the latest company to get in on the act and below is their press release.

Responding to  market  demands  we  have decided  to  introduce  the Cash for old  mobile phones imitative.The cash  raised  from returning old mobile  phone to us  can be  put against the  cost of  an  interactive  whiteboards, projectors or  other products  we  sell. If any School is interested why not get in touch with us and we will give you all the details.

This initiative will have the obvious benefits to environment and also raising scarce money to   put against the cost of this expensive equipment. In these  tough economic times everything helps.

Review: Mapping and atlas skills

Mapping and Atlas skills are 3 photocopiable resources from Prim-Ed. They are made up of 3 levels- lower, middle and upper. Lower is 1st and 2nd, middle is 3rd and 4th and Upper level is 5th and 6th Class. They focus in on specific mapping skills that are needed in the classroom and curriculum. They link well into the subject area of mathematics and geography.

Relevance to curriculum aims: This publication is based on the Irish curriculum- the subject areas of maths and geography. It includes a “proforma” which uses assessment for each child and it is also a handy way for you to plan your lesson in geography. There seems to be no reference of differentiation and this would be left up to the teacher. 4/5

Teacher usability:

This is very easy to use as most of the tasks could be done independently by the children, with some needing partners or groups. The lessons are easy to use for the children, with a quick introduction from the teacher. The activities are also relevant and enjoyable for the children. The books make good use out of the child’s own surrounding. 5/5

Value for money: This is great value for money for a school as it would cover two classes of work and therefore for 2 years! The books are only €16.11 so they do represent great value for the skint teacher! 5/5
Extras: none! 0/5 It can be used alongside the classroom’s atlases.

This book is a must as most of the geography textbooks do not focus in enough or thoroughly on the skills of mapping and spatial awareness. The teacher would able to use this to supplement their long term planning from year to year.

IWBFAQ: What’s better – a projector with tablet PC or an IWB?

Schools never have big budgets so they’re always looking for value for money.  Interactive Whiteboards can cost around €3,000 or so.  A projector and a tablet PC can cost about €1,200.  A projector with a slate can cost as little as €600.  So, is it better to buy 5 of the latter option for the same price as one IWB?  Wouldn’t it be good to get two tablet PCs and projectors instead?

I was asked this question by a teacher who is thinking about his options.  His colleague is very much in favour of the projector-tablet PC combo, whereas he favours the IWB despite the higher cost.

The question I always ask myself in a debate situation like this is: which of the two are teachers most likely to use?  My guess is that they will use IWBs more than the tablet-projector combo even though the latter is a much better pedagogical tool.  My theory is that the IWB isn’t a big step away from the blackboard and that’s what most teachers (whether they choose to admit ir or not) are still doing.

Another more practical issue with regards tablet PCs are their fragility.  Passing around a piece of equipment in a classroom will inevitably end up with a child dropping it and you’re down €600 straight away.  This is why some schools go with the slate, though I don’t like this model much, pretty much for the same reasons outlined above, but worse.  A slate is a little bit more difficult for a younger child to use.

Although this site isn’t aimed at 2nd level, I know a few teachers from this sector read this.  In this case, completely ignore my advice and buy the slate-projector combo!

Clare Teachers Embark on European Web 2.0 Project

It’s great to hear about schools who take it upon themselves to be involved in worthwhile and innovative projects. The following is a news release from Jim O’Sullivan from O’Sullivan Software Solutions, which outlines a really cool Web 2.0 project taken on by ten schools in Co. Clare.

“Teachers from eight Primary and two Secondary schools in Co. Clare have been taking part this week in workshops in Clare Education Centre and St. Joseph’s Secondary School, Tulla on how to use the latest Web 2.0 applications like blogs, photo galleries and Skype and other open source tools for teaching and learning. Some of them will also be managing their own web sites using the latest developments in content management tools which allow non-specialist users to generate and publish their own content online. This means that school web sites can be kept up to date with the latest school news including sports results, project work and other news from the school.

This initiative is part of the SoRuraLL project http://www.sorurall.eu/ , a 2 year European Commission sponsored project which is investigating how schools and other educational bodies in rural parts of Europe can use the latest developments in internet technologies to break down barriers and access educational opportunities. SoRuraLL involves partners in Greece, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Bulgaria and Poland as well as Ireland and next June the participating Clare schools will vote to select the Clare school project that best represents the work carried out by the Clare schools to represent them at the SoRuraLL conference being held in Patras, Greece in September 2010.

The Schools involved in this project are St Mochulla’s National School Tulla, St Josephs Secondary School Tulla, Kilbane national School Broadford, Moveen National School, Moyasta National School, St John Bosco, Community College Kildysart, Crusheen National School, Chriost Ri National School Cloughleigh Ennis and Feakle National School.”

Well done to all schools. Jim informed me that the schools will be adding lots of content to their new blogs and web sites. When they do, I’d love to add them my ever-growing “Schools that Blog” list!

A Case Study from Gifts4Fones

Gifts4Fones and the Jack and Jill Foundation have been in the news lately due to their similar ventures in schools.  Both organisations are offering schools the opportunity to swap old mobile phones for Interactive Whiteboards.  Gifts4fones are working with Smartboard and Jack and Jill are working with Clarity, who supply Promethean boards.  However, Gifts4fones are also offering schools the opportunity to swap phones for other hardware.  For example, a school in Athy swapped just over 100 phones for 4 brand new laptop cases.  What’s more, Gifts4phones plant a tree in every school that takes part in their offer.

There’s obviously some money in these old phones as I’d be struggling to think why two very large Interactive Whiteboard companies would be supporting these schemes.  However, that’s here nor there – if you want some new (and free) hardware, this is yet another example of how schools can raise much needed funds for ICT in spite of our government.

Gifts4fones sent me a case study of a school in Clonsilla that got 4 new laptops fro their scheme.  These pupils from St Philip’s Junior National School received these laptops from Gifts4Fones in return for collecting and donating old mobile phones.

The pupils at the Northwest Dublin school were one of the first groups in the country to sign up to the new scheme following the nationwide launch of Gifts4Fones.ie in September.

The Gifts4Fones scheme works by awarding points for recycled mobile phones. These points can then be traded for a variety of gifts on the gifts4fones.ie website.

“We are thrilled with our new laptops,” commented Frances Cooke, principal of St. Philip’s. “With school funding on the decline, this is a perfect opportunity for us to acquire new resources while helping the environment so we are encouraging the children to continue collecting.”

As part of the Gifts4Fones scheme, a tree is also donated to participants who collect over 100 phones. The trees are supplied by The Gift Tree Company, a Kildare based company specialising in supplying Irish trees as unique and original living gifts.

“Gifts4Fones are helping the environment while also supporting local business at the same time.” commented Sharon Butler, managing director of The Gift Tree Company. “We are delighted to be part of this worthwhile initiative.”

“It is becoming increasingly difficult for schools to get funding or raise money,” commented Alan McCarthy from Gifts4Fones. “This is a fantastic way for schools to generate much needed resources as well as helping the environment.”

Schools and community groups interested in participating in the Gifts4Fones scheme can register online at www.gifts4fones.ie, by email info@gifts4fones.ie or by calling 01 427 9797.