Archive for November, 2009

Feedback from NCTE Training of Primary Principals

ncte

Today I attended a seminar for primary school principals, which was given by the National Council for Technology in Education, (NCTE), in Kilkenny.  I was very interested in this seminar as I believed that I would be hearing all about the €150m grant that was recently announced.  Although this was indeed the case, the NCTE used the chance to tell principals about their new eLearning plan and some updates on Broadband and Continuing Professional Development.

The big news was the first phase of this €150m grant, €22m of which is about to be unleashed onto primary schools to invest in hardware.  There has been a bit of confusion of late regarding whether schools will have to use the money in a particular way or whether we can spend it ad lib.

Today this was cleared up.

Schools must use the NCTE’s procurement procedure.  The procedure has two phases.  The first one includes: PCs, laptops, printers and projectors.  Schools must buy equipment from this list using their grant for all their classrooms before thinking about anything else.  Now, just before you get on the phone to your favourite supplier, there’s a further restriction.  You must use their procurement suppliers.  This means that you have to send an email to a particular address stating the types of hardware (from the above list) and the specs you require.  You should then get a few emails back over a few days from pre-selected companies with their best offers.  You can then purchase your piece of equipment.

Interestingly, the people who came up with this €150m plan, happen to be from industry.  I was thinking they weren’t going to do this for free.  It looks like the pre-selected companies on the procurement procedures all come from this list: Lenovo, Microsoft, etc.

More interestingly, the prices of these PCs and peripherals is much more expensive than what you’d expect to pay in a shop.  A laptop will cost a minimum of €500 by the looks of things and a PC, €400.  I can get really good refurbished PCs and Laptops for half those prices but I won’t be allowed.  In fact, even if you were to buy equivalent equipment in a shop like PC World, you’d find it much cheaper.  Your poor local IT shop won’t be getting a penny either.

But what if you already have PCs, laptops, printers and projectors in every room?  Good for you, you can now select stuff from List 2 from the procurement list.  This list includes networking hardware, Interactive Whiteboards and visualisers.  However, you can’t go near this list unless you’ve been through list one.  And before you ask…yes, they will be checking.

OK, so what about software?  The bad news is that this grant is only for hardware.  It’s looking very likely that software is going to be pushed aside for a VLE development.  Nobody has told me this so it’s just a guess but if this Smart Plan is to be followed, this was a recommendation.  If you are into software, I’d start converting your product into a SCORM compatible application.

Another part of this seminar was to introduce a rather impressive (and expensive) looking planning book.  This is a guide to the four step procedure for creating an eLearning plan for your school.  The steps are very good and the guide is excellent with some decent case studies.

However, my big big criticism is in the actual eLearning document.  It is still in the form of a large poster with four stages of “e”ness – the initial stage, the e-Enabled stage, the e-Confident stage and the e-Mature stage.  All four stages are at best arbirtary stages of a school’s ICT infrastructure and I found it very difficult to pinpoint where I was on more than half of the criteria.  I was generally somewhere in between two criteria.  I really didn’t want my school to become e-Mature in certain areas as we would have forgotten about pedagogy and become way too obsessed with the technology.  I also thought some of the e-Mature statements could have settled well in the Initial stage.  Another criticism is that some staff would consider themselves at one stage and some others at a completely different stage.  Even writing this paragraph is confusing so god help schools trying to figure out where they are.

Finally, a segment was left to update us on broadband.  People with satellite connections should be getting them replaced before 2011.  People who object to being filtered from Web 2.0 applications like YouTube and Flickr will also be getting some new layers of filtering – 7 in total.  Hopefully one of them will be completely unfiltered broadband.

All in all, the seminar was useful.  I couldn’t leave without asking about Interactive Whiteboards and why they weren’t being recommended by the NCTE, considering this is where the demand on the ground is coming from.  I had prepared myself for the NCTE line where it would be explained to me about how schools need to reach the stage where they would be “ready” to tackle IWBs and how they aren’t the best teaching tool, etc.  I retorted with my prepared line about knowing the strengths and weaknesses of IWBs but the fact remained that if you asked any teacher in Ireland what piece of equipment they would like in their classroom, they would inevitably say “IWBs”.  It was a small victory for me when the presenter couldn’t disagree.

Schools are going to ignore NCTE advice

loadsofmoney

Following the announcement by the Department of Education that all schools will share a grant of €1,700 + €34 per pupil, I’ve been asking primary school teachers and principals how they are going to spend their money.  Well, to be honest, several primary school principals are asking me about how to spend their grant.

These principals are not tech-savvy people and many of them have little interest in ICT although they say they understand the benfits.  Every single principal that I have met want to buy interactive whiteboards.  The NCTE’s clear advice is not to do this.  Rather they would prefer all classrooms to be kitted out with a laptop and projector.

Since 100% of principals and teachers that I have spoken with are planning on buying IWBs instead of the NCTE’s plan, I can assume a very large percentage of schools across the country will be doing the same.  Since the grant will not be enough to kit out every classroom with an IWB, there are going to be schools half kitted out with boards and half kitted out with nothing.

I’m not sure that this is a positive thing but it does show that principals believe in the importance of IWBs in schools despite the NCTE’s best intentions to slowly incorporate them.  Schools want them now and I think the NCTE should just give in and start listening.

At last, the voices of reason

clarification

This is  a press release I received today.  I was thrilled to receive it because in all the madness of the anger, revenge and striking, some agencies decided to think about the people that are being affected most.  So without further a do – Primary Management Bodies call on Unions and Government to avoid disrupting children’s education

It is widely acknowledged that education is a major part of the solution to the current national crisis.

Primary school management bodies call on government and unions to enter discussions to prevent industrial action that will disrupt the education of children.

There are three proposed days of strike action, the first of which is to take place tomorrow 24th November. Losing three full day’s education at a time when the service is already suffering from increased class sizes, removal of learning support roles and a moratorium on the creation and/or replacement of middle management posts is a significant impact on a child’s education.

The proposed day/s of action will place great pressure on parents and guardians, an increasing number of whom are themselves struggling to maintain their own employment.

The children in primary schools are not responsible for current government policy nor should they be caught up in industrial action.

The Boards of Management of primary schools comprising of up to 21,000 volunteers and the statutory employers of all staff, have no power over matters of pay or pensions.

It is still not too late to avert these days of action and we call on the Minister for Education and Science and Unions to immediately enter talks and to provide responsible leadership at this time.

Jennifer Byrne, Acting Secretary,Church of Ireland Board of Education, <jennifer.byrne@rcbdub.org>
Breda Corr, General Secretary, National Association of Boards of Management in Special Education,<nabmse1@eircom.net>
Eileen Flynn, General Secretary,Catholic Primary Schools Management Association, <eflynn@cpsma.ie>
Bláthnaid ní Ghréacháin, Ardfheidhmeannach, Gaelscoileanna,<blathnaid@gaelscoileanna.ie>
Caoimhin O hEaghra, Rúnaí, Foras Pátrúnachta na Scoileanna Lán-Ghaeilge,<caoimhin.oheaghra@mie.ie>
Paul Rowe, Chief Executive, Educate Together, <paul.rowe@educatetogether.ie>
A hearty congratulations to all members of Primary Management for being balanced in their criticism of both the Unions and the Government.  Both cohorts are acting completely unreasonably and need to turn the revenge-focussed propoganda into pro-active solutions.

Lecture: Technology in Primary Schools

handsup

Readers of this web site know that I enjoy ranting about technology in primary schools.  I’ve been asked to give a talk in Carlow Town on Wednesday, 25th November about how schools around the country are using technology in their everyday lives.

The talk is aimed at parents, teachers, business people and anyone with an interest in pedagogy.  The plan of action is that I’ll spend an hour or so showcasing some of the cool things that schools around the world are doing, including: video conferencing, blogging, using Nintendo and playing with robots to learn.  I’ll also add in a few other bits and pieces such as building in virtual worlds and making videos.

The second half of the talk is about Interactive Whiteboards.  This essentially shows people what they are, why teachers love them and where you can get them from.

It all kicks off from 7:00pm in Carlow Educate Together National School.  The organisers are hoping to raise money for the local hospice so do try and come along.  I can personally recommend the tea and coffee after the talk!

For more information, you can send me a tweet @simonmlewis or contact me by clicking on the link at the top of this web site.

At least €1,700 for ICT for every school?

man-and-computer-money

According to a principal colleague of mine, it appears that every school will get €1700 plus €34 per pupil (based on last year’s numbers) from this new ICT grant announced last week. This principal rang the Department of Education to find out about this grant.  Big schools are going to get a lot of money!  However, will it be anywhere near enough to fund anything worthwhile?  An average 4 classroom school will get approximately €5,100 (based on 100 pupils), which is almost €1,300 per mainstream classroom.  However, one can’t leave the support teachers out, so let’s call it €1,000 per room.

However, just before you were about to purchase a projector and 2-3 laptops, the government have decided that there will be guidance issued shortly. Schools will be tied into department approved schemes in the purchasing of laptops, printers etc.  This creates two suspicions for me.  Firstly, almost every single member of the Smart Committee would have vested interests.  That is, they are the heads of large corporations and I’m sure they’ll be looking for some form of payback for their time.   Secondly, from looking at the current NCTE, (the government’s ICT in Education department), guidelines, it’s unlikely that classrooms will be getting more than two pieces of hardware.  You might get a laptop and a projector for your €1,000 or maybe a projector and visualiser.

Having perused the recommendations of the report with arbitrary figures of 5 computers per classroom, this grant will not cover very much unless schools are allowed to be more flexible in their purchasing power.  For example, refurbished computers are very cost effective solutions or why can’t schools use outsourcing solutions to reduce their costs?

There’s certainly no chance of schools buying Interactive Whiteboards.  The NCTE refuse to recommend them and even if they did, there wouldn’t be enough money in your pot to get them anyway.

Review: YTeach (Prim-Ed)

yteach

YTeach is a new online resource aimed at children from 3rd class upwards. When I say upwards, I mean upwards to the Leaving Certificate. Prim-Ed are Ireland’s distributors of this massive database of activities, which cover the Maths and Science curriculum.  This review focuses on the Primary content.

Prim-Ed have tailored the content to fit the Irish primary curriculum, which is essential. There are nearly 2,000 maths and 1,200 science resources, which is a heck of a lot. The only problem is that it’s going to take a long long time to sort through them all.

To make things easier, Prim-Ed have divided these thousands of resources into individual strands of the curriculum, which is somewhat helpful. However, with 241 resources alone on operations in the Number strand of Maths, there’s still a lot to filter through before finding what you’re looking for.

To test things out, I tried to find a resource to help me support long division for a 5th class lesson. My first port of call was to search for “long division” in the clearly labeled search section. 164 Mathematics resources were found. Checking the first 5 options, none of them were relevant to long division, which was a shame. Checking out the Irish curriculum resources section and going through the curriculum proved unsuccessful too.  I knew there had to be a lesson or presentation about long division in there somewhere, but, to be honest, I just couldn’t have been bothered trawling through the clutter.

In general, the content of yTeach is divided up into activities, presentations, animations, slideshows, simulations, games and illustrations.  Most of them teach a concept well and look professional.

If I were to improve this resource, I would sub-categorise the resources even further or improve the quality of the search engine.  If I want to teach long division, I would prefer to not have to trawl through irrelevant search results.

I think yTeach has potential, but still needs a good bit of work in its organisation to make it more accessible to the average teacher.

€150m for Smart Schools isn’t smart at all

smartschools

I feel that I should reiterate that I have deep concerns about the €150m investment in “Smart Schools”, which I wrote about a couple of months ago (http://www.anseo.net/?p=1538), as it’s just been published this week.

My main problem is with the impression that our ICT infrastructure in our schools is even adequate.  There appears to be a lot of denial in the report, suggesting that we have ratios of 9.1:1 in primary schools when so many of these computers are broken, ancient or in computer rooms (or all three).

We have had almost nothing in the way of ICT investment since 2000, which means that schools had to have a haphazard adhoc response to funding ICTs.  Thus schools will have a mixture of equipment from donations, Tesco, fundraising and perhaps sponsorship.

Although there is now a lot of optimism in ICT circles, in my opinion, this is only because of Interactive Whiteboards, yet they are not recommended in the report.  Since the announcement of the ICT grant, I am getting dozens of calls asking about IWBs, even though they aren’t recommended in the €5,000 per classroom grant.  Schools are ignoring the NCTE advice and are buying these boards in favour of laptops, projectors, etc.  We need to ask why this is instead of completely ignoring it.

I also find it astounding that the committee contained zero teachers at any level, primary or otherwise.  As much as these heavyweights of Irish business and government officials know their ICT, it is difficult to see how they can relate to pedagogy seeing as neither have any training in educational matters.  Why were there no members of the CESI committee involved in this report?  They are the voice of teachers in all three levels of our education system with both knowledge of ICT and pedagogy.

Heads in the Cloud

headcloud

Over the last couple of years, the term “Cloud Computing” has been buzzing around in the techie world.  Inevitably, it buzzes into the education world at some point.  And yes, it’s starting to cause a bit of a stir.  Today a principal from Co. Meath impressed me greatly when he suggested that another of his colleagues try it out. So what is cloud computing and why should Irish schools care?

Simply put, cloud computing allows you to log on to a computer somewhere in the world and use its applications, often for free. A number of companies offer a cloud computing service, most famously, Google with their Google Apps. Google Apps allows users to use fully functioning word processors, spreadsheets, presentation software, email, calendars, web design software, chat, video sharing and lots more for free! All you need is an Internet connection and a school.

Little did I know, but I had been using cloud computing in two schools before I’d even heard of the term.  Right now, my school uses cloud computing through Google apps as a communication tool for all staff and board of management.  I thought it might be interesting for other principals to see how we’ve incorporated it in our school in the hope that it might inspire others to do the same.  I’ve also added some other ideas at the end.

1.  Noticeboard

We no longer use a noticeboard in the staffroom as all staff log into our Google site from anywhere in the world and the first thing they see is our ‘virtual’ noticeboard and a staff calendar, which outlines what’s going on over the next few days.

intra-overv

All staff can add events to the staff calendar or add announcements on the Virtual Noticeboard.  Although we are a small school, there are, on average, 4-5 announcements made each week.  These range from reminders about meetings to announcements about new resources.  Teachers often post up announcements that they have uploaded new resources to our resource sharing section.  The calendar also gets used for smaller events that don’t generally make it on to traditional staffroom noticeboards.  For example, people can see who’s gone on EPV days, if the principal (me) is at a meeting or if a psychologist is in.  Another cool feature of the “Announcements” section is the ability for staff to comment.  For example, last week I made an announcement on the site asking staff which week they would prefer parent-teacher meetings and gave a date to answer by.  50% of the staff left a comment on the site and the dates were chosen.

2. Plans and Policies

I always had an issue with the traditional school plans and policies folders.  I never felt that they were alive and therefore rarely used them.  I always got the feeling that they were only ever taken out around the time of a WSE and then weren’t really used apart from that.  As I trained in the UK, the school plan was a lot more structured and essentially was a yearly plan (in some cases a termly plan) for all teachers.  However, I still felt that even though this was a step in the right direction, they were rarely updated and could become stagnant after a couple of years.  Putting plans and policies on Google Apps allows them to become colaborative documents.

intra-plans

Staff can have full control of reading and editing school plans on the fly thanks to Google Apps’ in-built Word Processor, Google Docs.  Even better, two or three members of staff can be working on a particular school plan at the same time on different computers.  Google Docs automatically updates the document every few seconds so real time changes can be seen by everyone working on it.  This allows our plans to be more alive and, most importantly, used.

3. Reporting

I’d imagine many schools have a principal with a head like a sieve.  Often I’m asked to do several things by several people and reminded to do several other things by several other people.  I usually remember one or two.  Most organised principals have a number of reporting books.  So, if someone injures themselves on yard, they fill a report in an incident book.  If someone finds a plug loose in their classroom, they might fill in an entry into a caretaker’s book.  If someone wants the school to order resources, there might be a resource ordering book.  In my school, we use Google Forms.  It’s a really really easy application, which allows staff to fill out pre-designed forms to report any of the above.  Below is a screenshot of our Incident Report Form.

intra-report

When a staff member fills out the incident report form, they click on a Submit button.  That’s when the magic happens.  The form is automatically saved into a spreadsheet file along with any other incidents that have been reported.  If I need to, I can print out this file for a hard copy or I can easily refer to the incident by searching the document.  The use of forms in my cloud has been one of the most successful things in our school.  Great things I didn’t expect to come out of it is the complete ease of ordering reources.  Every month, my secretary makes an announcement that she’s going shopping and we need to fill in our order resource form.  A few days later, she goes shopping.  Throughout the rest of the month, if I think of something I need, I fill out the form and it will get ordered.

4. Roll Book

My favourite function of my cloud is our electronic roll book.  I absolutely hate our archaic roll book.  It is the bane of most teacher’s lives and the reason teachers don’t leave school until tea time on the last day of the school year.  So, I “electronified” it! Every teacher can now log on to a virtual rollbook from the home page and type in the attendance for the day. Because Google Apps allows multiple users to use the same document at the same time, they can open the same roll book at any time and it doesn’t matter, even if 5 other teachers are using it.

intra-roll

I simply created a spreadsheet using Google Spreadsheets at the beginning of the year, and like a real rollbook, teachers simply type in a “1″ for attendence and a “0″ for an absense.  I added a couple of other features to make it even more useful.  If someone is late but not too late to be absent, the teacher can mark them in the rollbook with a “1″ but colour codes it red.  Therefore, I can have a glance at a child’s attendence record and if there’s lots of red number ones, I can chat to parents about punctuality.  The only downside is that we still have to fill in the real roll book.  Rather than individual teachers doing this too, the virtual roll book is opened by a delegated member of staff at the end of her day and transferred into the real rollbook. The upshot of this is that the virtual rollbook does all the tallying and balances the books at the end of each section of the year so until the department wake up and stop making us fill in a big old book, it’s not a bad pay off.

5. Staff Meetings

“Will you stick x on the agenda please?” is an often forgotten job, which can lead to disgruntled staff members.  In my school, if a staff member wants to add something to the staff meeting, we have a “live” agenda document which can be added to by anyone.  A few days before the meeting, the document is “closed” and the agenda is set.

6.  Learning Support

I have found the “cloud” one of the best things for Learning Support.  One of my aims of Learning Support was to have weekly booster sessions for children who might not have grasped a concept during class, for whatever reason.  I wanted to free up a 15 minute session for 5 days so the support staff could teach that concept to get them back in the fold.  Sometimes a child doesn’t need a long period of Learning Support so this was ideal.  However, it would be almost impossible to manage without my cloud.

intra-catchup

If a teacher feels that a child (or small group of children) require a boost in a certain area of the curriculum, they can book a “catch-up session”.  This involves them filling out a simple form.  The Learning Support team then “grab” and book a particular session for a particular week.  The teacher can then, at a glance, see when their child will be given this session.  It works on a first come first served basis.  It’s working really really well in my school.

Another cool thing for our Learning Support team is to have access to any of our assessment results.  Our Micra-T and Sigma-T results can be seen in a table so that we can pinpoint and prioritise who will be allocated Learning Support.

7. Cúntas Míosúil

I have posted about this electronic Cúntas Míosúil on Anseo.net before and it is also available on the IPPN web site.  However, I have now incorporated it into our cloud.  Staff can now update their Cúntas Míosúil on the fly and we can check them out at a glance, which is pretty cool!

8. School Web Site

Our award winning school web site is based on WordPress, a content management system.  In my opinion, it is one of the easiest and most powerful web design tools available.  Oh, and it’s free.  I’ve been writing for years about why schools need to stop designing static web sites and move over to more dynamic ones.  For me the key is that anyone can update the web site from any computer with an Internet connection.  My school web site is updated by staff and pupils.  My next aim is to get parents involved too!  You can read my article: “Why Blogging is best” for lots more information.

Because we are an educational establishment, Google Apps is free! It doesn’t matter how old our computers are as long as they can connect to the Internet. By using the “cloud”, we have loads of applications and we don’t really need any office software.

So what about non-administration stuff?  What about resources or software or teaching tools?  Step two in our plan is our thin-client network set up in the school. This involved buying a pretty good server and lots of really cheap PCs which all run through the server. We’ve put in place plans to upload every CD and DVD in the school on to this server so that a teacher no longer needs to worry about finding a piece of music or a particular video clip. All our software is also going to be uploaded to avoid CD breakages.

Another great thing about this setup is our ability to share. If I open up my IWB software, I can access anyone else’s lessons because it’s all stored in one place. Likewise, if I create a flipchart, I can upload it to the server for the other teachers. This is nothing special as all schools can do this over a normal network. However, by giving our teachers remote access to our server, effectively they can access our very own cloud from the comfort of their homes.

I see the future of schools in the cloud.  We’re already floating around in it and are seeing great benefits to our communication and overall effectiveness.  We are also saving a hell of a lot of money due to these services being completely free.  I’d love to hear about other schools using cloud computing or other clever ways of using Google Apps.   We’ve reached a point in computing where schools need not be spending lots of money on equipment or even maintenence.  All we need now is faster Internet connections! :)

Smart has the biggest market share in Ireland

smartborad_banner_mpu_gif

The following press release confirms that Smart have the biggest market share in IWB technology in Ireland.  This is interesting news for all those schools that believed it was their main competitor who were the number one seller.  I’m assuming within a few days I’ll be getting an email from them with a retort! ;)   Anyway, below is the unedited press release:

Steljes, exclusive distributor of SMART  Technologies in Ireland, is proud to announce that the latest figures released by Futuresource Consulting show that the SMART Board™ interactive whiteboard is the number one selling interactive whiteboard in Ireland with 45 % market share.

Futuresource Consulting is an independent research firm that tracks
sales by country and globally. Since entering the Irish market, the
SMART Board has steadily increased its market share from 37.3% in Q2
2009 to 45 % Q3 2009. The latest figures show that the SMART Board is
the preferred choice for schools with a clear lead of 15% over its
nearest competitor.

Commenting on the Futuresource Consulting figures Greg Tierney,
market development manager at Steljes , says ”Over the last year we
have seen significant increases in SMART’s market share as more and
more schools realise the benefits of the SMART Board interactive
whiteboard. Schools prefer the touch capability and ease of use of
the Board to enrich the learning experience for their students and
improve learning outcomes.”

Steljes has increased its nation-wide team of Education Development
Consultants (EDC) to help cope with demand from schools and colleges.
The EDC team are all fully qualified teachers as well as experts in
SMART solutions. Tierney continues “The EDC team has been
instrumental in supporting the successful adoption of the technology.
As fully qualified teachers themselves, they are in an unique
position to offer the best advice and training on how to maximise the
potential of SMART’s interactive technologies and give students an
unparalleled learning experience.

National Geographic teaming up with Promethean

promethean1

The following is a press release.

National Geographic and Promethean unleash the power of nature in classrooms country-wide

Today Promethean, a global leader in education technology solutions, introduces National Geographic Young Explorer ActivLessons; a series of interactive whiteboard lessons designed specifically for pupils in junior infants, senior infants and first class. Engineered to expand and enhance the reach of the popular National Geographic Young Explorer magazine, the ActivLessons provide a whole-class digital supplement to the series. The range of exciting activities for interactive whiteboards is guaranteed to spark the interest of inquisitive young minds.

Developed in partnership with the National Geographic Society, the Young Explorer ActivLessons are based on the stories and instruction in Young Explorer and feature stunning photography supported by group activities, narrated stories, printable worksheets and a full teacher guide.  The National Geographic Young Explorer Magazine and ActivLessons work together to improve literacy skills and introduce learners to science and social studies.

While the Young Explorer ActivLessons stand alone, they can also be used with the magazine, offering teachers multiple options to create engaging lessons that provide practice with reading strategies, build academic vocabulary and meet NCLB goals.

Brent Taggart, Head of Promethean Planet and Strategy said, “Promethean is thrilled to partner with National Geographic to produce the Young Explorer ActivLessons. Intended to be teacher led; the design and functionality of the ActivLessons facilitate versatility in the classroom by offering multiple options for student engagement and educator adaptability. All the activities contained are flexible, collaborative and extendable; key requirements of any content created for Promethean’s ActivClassroom.”

Fran Downey, Vice-President and Publisher of National Geographic added, “National Geographic Young Explorer is known for teaching important literacy skills through high-interest science and social studies content. The magazine connects to existing curriculum while inspiring students to care about our planet. The partnership with Promethean, a leader in developing interactive classroom solutions for the education market, allows teachers to present truly interactive lessons that will engage students and deepen understanding. This takes the printed magazine to a whole new level.”

Young Explorer ActivLessons can be purchased and downloaded through Promethean Planet’s online shop www.PrometheanPlanet.com/NationalGeographicExplorer where educators can also browse a wide variety of digital content.

Promethean Planet will be introducing a range of new functionality over the coming months to further address the modern-day educator’s needs. For further information please visit www.PrometheanPlanet.com