Archive for the ‘Curriculum’ Category

Christmas art

twas-the-night-before-christmas-21590693

This article was first published in 2008 by Rozz who was starting a Christmas themed week in Visual Arts.  Have a look at some of the ideas here – they might get you through the last couple of days of the term!

I am starting my Christmas themed art this week.

I am a firm believer in

a. Not overdoing it just because it is Christmas

b. integrating and linking with all subjects while keeping the integrals of the Visual Art Curriculum fully alive in my Art Lessons

My advice is to stick to a theme, I am going with the poem ” A Night before Christmas”, a beautifully traditional and atmospheric poem for the children to listen to and to read together. (more…)

Why learning tables off by heart is rubbish

rotelearning

As a conclusion to Maths Week 2011 and as an aside to this year’s Tables Tips Twitter Project, I am resurrecting an article about learning tables off by heart.  This post originally appeared on Anseo.net back in January 2008.  Almost 4 years later, I wonder if opinions about learning tables has changed.  Read on and see what you think!

A few days ago on Education Posts, I proposed that learning tables off by heart is rubbish. My proposal was met with general disagreement and in some cases, complete contempt! I decided to prove my point by asking teachers to learn a few sentences off by heart just like children are asked to learn number sentences off by heart.

They didn’t know the significance of them, exactly like a child doesn’t know the significance of learning tables when told to do so. So here’s the sentences. If you want to take part in the challenge, don’t read on after the sentences until you’ve tried learning them off by heart.

Fred Davidson lives in Aaron Zion Avenue
Greg Fredson lives in Aaron Clare Avenue
Isaac Davidson lives in Aaron Clare Avenue
Fred Davidson works in the Bill Davidson Building
Greg Fredson works in the David Bill Building
Isaac Davidson works in the Clare Fredericks Building

It was interesting to see how many people accepted the challenge.  There were 32 responses to my challenge but only 7 actually took it on.  The others used the thread to give their opinion on my hypothesis.  There was a strong sway of disagreement with me (57%) and only about 22% agreed.

The general views of those who disagreed were:

  • There is no other/better way to teach tables
  • The sentences have no relevance to tables
  • Learning tables off by heart did me no harm
  • Call me old fashioned but…
  • We shouldn’t spoonfeed children

Of those who attempted the challenge, only one out of seven considered it easy.  The rest who found it difficult gave the following responses:

  • I got muddled / scrambled / confused
  • My head got exhausted
  • I had no motivation / interest to learn them
  • I expected them to be easy to learn but they weren’t
  • They weren’t important to me
  • It was frustrating
  • I’m too busy

It was also interesting to see how some teachers recorded ways they tried to learn the sentences.  Some said they tried looking for patterns in the sentences. Others made a story up (e.g. similar surnames became part of a family) and finally others grouped similar names together to try and find patterns, etc.

Next, before the reveal, I’d like to compare how learning tables is very similar to having to learn those sentences off by heart.

  1. When you give children tables, many of them will experience feelings like those expressed by respondents, being muddled, confused, seeing no point, no motivation, etc.
  2. Perhaps the majority of teachers are good at learning things off by heart, due to the Leaving Cert relying heavily on this skill. To become a teacher, you have to score very high points in the exams. However, perhaps most people are not good at learning things off by heart.
  3. The six sentences below have complete relevance to learning tables. In fact, the sentences below represent 6 number facts. They seemed meaningless to many of you because they have appeared in a new way. A child comes across tables initially as something new too.
  4. Every word below is also a real word and you can explain what every word means. Putting them together, however, they don’t seem to have any pattern. Likewise, every number in a tables fact is also known to a child but put them together and they don’t seem to make sense or be very interesting. The reason some of you weren’t bothered learning the sentences off is the same reason a child wouldn’t either.

Here’s how the sentences below are, in fact, tables facts.

  • Any of the names represent a number. E.g. Aaron=1, Bill=2, Clare=3 and so on. Z words represent zero.
  • Lives = Plus
  • Works = Multiplied by
  • Avenue = Equals
  • Building = Is

So to translate:

Fred Davidson lives in Aaron Zion Avenue (6 + 4 = 10)
Greg Fredson lives in Aaron Clare Avenue (7 + 6 = 13)
Isaac Davidson lives in Aaron Clare Avenue (9 + 4 = 13)
Fred Davidson works in the Bill Davidson Building (6 x 4 = 24)
Greg Fredson works in the David Bill Building (7 x 6 = 42)
Isaac Davidson works in the Clare Fredericks Building (9 x 4 = 36)

As far as I would be concerned, all the responses in this discussion represented exactly how a child feels when given a list of tables to learn. Just because I represented my tables in words doesn’t mean they should have been any more difficult.

The people who looked for patterns, made relations and grouped similar sentences were all using strategies to help them learn. If you can give your pupils strategies like that, e.g. David Fredson also lives in Aaron Zion Avenue (commutative property), you’ll see the benefits straightaway.

My conclusion to this is that we need to accept that teaching strategies is far more beneficial than simply learning tables off by heart. No doubt, some will still disagree and I’d be interested to see your reasons, to which I’d be glad to respond.

Maths Week Tables Tips

vintage-table

Throughout Maths Week, teachers around the country were asked to give tips for learning multiplication tables using the hashtag, #tablestips, on Twitter.  We had a good response with 16 teachers tweeting lots of different tips.  The most popular tip involved the 9 times tables, with several good ideas to help learn them.  Other ideas included some interesting tips about patterns of 3 and 5 times tables.  I’ve compiled all the tips into a PDF document, which is free to download.  Thanks to @fboss for recommending Tweetdoc.org to compile the tweets.

Download the Document: Tables Tips.

The Big Book of Energizers

247

The Big Book of Energizers

September is always full of energy and optimism for teachers, parents and children! After a few weeks (even days,  sometimes),  it may feel like you never had the summer holidays – you are tired, the children are listless and unmotivated and they are finding it hard to keep the class on task. (more…)

My take on the Maths Crisis

math2

As with the Leaving Certificate results, the Junior Certificate’s showed that there is a worrying trend in maths results in this country.  Most of the focus is being centred on the estimation from the Teaching Council that over 30% of maths teachers hold no 3rd level qualifications in mathematics.

However, just because a teacher has a lot of knowledge about maths, does it make them a good teacher of the subject?  Isn’t a qualification in mathematics less important than a qualification in teaching mathematics?  Perhaps this is where the focus should be.

At primary level, the aims of the maths curriculum include fostering a love of mathematics, problem solving and making maths all about real life situations.  None of these skills (as far as I remember from my degree) are learned in a 3rd level mathematics degree.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/

Gone are the days in primary schools where children used “borrow and payback” and other random unconnected rules for solving problems.  Gone are the days of Maths books with pages of meaningless sums.  Gone are the days where a teacher gives an example of how to “do” a problem and children simply “do” more of the same problems with different numbers without really understanding why.

How primary school teachers help children learn these concepts has completely changed.  We encourage children to use concrete materials as much as possible before moving towards the more abstract areas of maths.  We build upon their previous knowledge so they don’t have to learn loads of rules off by heart.  We give children strategies and make them real to them. Do we see this at second level enough?

It’s often been said that teachers who struggled with Maths in their own school days make much better Maths teachers than those who got the abstract concepts easily.  There may be some truth in that.  Perhaps, these teachers can bring their students along the mathematical journey more effectively,  from figuring out that 1+1=2 towards differential equations and giving them the stepping stones along the way.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikehamm/

Engineers Ireland claimed the “crisis in maths” at second level reflects a “total systemic failure in national education structures” and it’s difficult to argue against this.  The worrying thing, as usual, is that the blame is being centred at the wrong place.   While having a base level of knowledge and understanding of maths is important, the way it is taught is much more important. It’s good to see that Project Maths is being rolled out because it does focus on good methodologies and making maths more real to students.

Perhaps if Project Maths is given a chance, we may see increases in our mathematical scores.

 

Guest Post: Ceol Ireland

carmel

Thanks to Carmel Dunne and Ali Giusti for their guest article about Ceol, a music programme for primary schools.  Ceol has been around since 1998 in classrooms and is widely considered to be the best music programme on the market.  In this article, the concept of Ceol is explained.

More than any other subject, music has an incredibly stimulating effect on a child’s brain. Stimulation by the best music experiences hot-wires the two hemispheres of the young brain. It’s a fact that has been proven by myriad scientific studies (in Stanford University, Toronto University, etc.), and something that Carmel Dunne’s personal experience has borne out. Carmel set up Ceol in 1998. Ceol is a curriculum support, approved programme that offers innovative music education for primary schools from Junior Infants upwards, as well as pre-schoolers.

We want to make this island of Ireland a truly musical country and start with the youngest and get them to really, really love music. And why not do it through the place where they’re meant to be doing it anyway –  schools.

The project has now expanded beyond her wildest dreams. “We never expected it to go beyond ten schools in Ballyfermot and now there are 350 schools throughout Ireland”, she says. Children love the programme, their teachers do too as the curriculum comes alive, as intended by the Department of Education & Skills. The Ceol approach is entirely different to teaching methods of yore. Carmel, who spent 33 years in the public service and for whom music was always a hobby, recalls disliking piano lessons as a child. “The way I was taught was very formal and it wasn’t fun at all. But we’ve made it as fun as possible and we don’t introduce children to the stave or notes immediately”, she says.  “One teacher said to me recently that her junior infants are now reading notes and they don’t realise that they are now more literate in music than they are in any other language. By the time they are ready for instruments, they can do anything because they have pitch, rhythm, listening and responding, composition and they have an appreciation of different kinds of music without even knowing it.” Carmel’s colleague, Ali Giusti, is a very musically creative addition to Ceol Ireland since 2006 and has added hugely to the immensely popular, nationwide programmes.

Carmel Dunne is the founder and executive director of Ceol Ireland. Ali Giusti, a professional musician joined the CEol Ireland team in 2006 as the creative development and training executive.

The Big Book of Calmers-Review

calmers

topoftheclassWe all have had those days when the kids are hyped up and it is very hard to get them back down again, step in Jenny Mosley!
I love Jenny Mosley and everything that she does. This “Big book of Calmers” does not disappoint. It contains over 120 individual activities for the teacher to use when seeking a calming classroom! I would recommend this book to any teacher( newly qualified or more experienced) as essential must have! Her other book “ The Big Book of Energisers” ties in perfectly with this one and I will be reviewing this too.

Relevance to the curriculum aims: 5/5

Absolutely, though not a stand alone lesson, this book can be used in many ways. As an SPHE starter, circle time or in general anytime during the day you feel stressed or you sense the class or a students are becoming overexcited. It would also be excellent for the other Arts subjects like Drama or Visual Arts.
You can use “Calmers” to start the day, end the day or to calm children down after a loud, wet play.
This toolkit of “Calmers” is suitable for young and old, special needs and for teaching the children the independent skills they need to help them calm down!
Calmers links in brilliantly with the whole Jenny Mosley package of circle time, golden rules and golden time. They help the class to turn negative thinking around and build up self esteem. Everyone( including the teacher!) can benefit from this! Many of the activities focus on anger management, emotional self awareness and teach the children how to interact positively with each other. What amazing life skills! If the children in our care could learn how to curb their anger, deal with negative thoughts and become more aware of their emotions, we as teachers would be doing a fantastic job!
Teacher usability:5/5
Really easy! The teacher can just pick up this book and begin the calming! The activities include stretches, relaxation techniques, controlled breathing, visualisation, stories, songs, role play and much much more!
The activities are marked with one of three symbols. the first one tells you that this activity can be played quickly and easily. The second one tells you that it will take a bit of organising from the teacher. The third symbol explains that you will need a large space. Great idea, this adds to the ease of use for the teacher.

Value for money 5/5
It works out at 18.95, converted using www.xe.com as €21.95. This represents excellent value for money as you will have this book for years to come. It would be a must for any SPHE/Drama/Visual Arts school resource as well.
Extras-0/5
No extras-it would be great to see how Jenny Mosley implements these herself, maybe she would consider showing some teachers in real classrooms how these activities can work and do work. These could be placed on her website or DVD.

Total score: 15/20

Well recommended-click on the link below to buy this from Amazon.

Missing the Point about Maths

The "Scandal" in the Sunday Times

I don’t usually comment on second level education on Anseo.net.  However, I’m fairly open about the fact that I think the Leaving Cert is a dreadful idea.  Like many others, I feel that the Leaving Cert is simply a memory exercise, where one has to – in the words of Daithí Ó’Mhurchú – regurgitate the last 6 years of knowledge.  I did my Leaving Cert in 1997 and it hasn’t changed that much.  My main memory of the Leaving Certificate was choosing the bits of the curriculum that my teachers thought were going to come up in the exams.  Therefore, in English, we didn’t bother studying any of Shakespeare’s sonnets or Paradise Lost by Milton.  In Maths, I think I skipped learning a few theorems off by heart, which brings me to my point.

The Sunday Times reported today that there is a bit of a scandal about Paper One of the Maths Leaving Cert.  I read the first words of the argument:

Paper 1 was the most difficult yet, featuring questions that…

I expected the end of the sentence to be something like “were not on the curriculum” or “a higher standard than previous years” but no.  The problem was that these were questions “that pupils could not have anticipated”.

In other words, they were questions that pupils guessed would not be on the paper so didn’t learn them.  There’s one of two things wrong here.  The first is that perhaps the curriculum for second level subjects is too broad and thus there’s too much to learn.  The second possibility is that students are not learning the full curriculum relying on predictions and rote learning based on previous years.

However, the biggest thing that is wrong is the general acceptance that not being able to anticipate questions is an issue.  The Maths paper, I believe, should test Maths ability not rote learning.  However, unfortunately, I anticipate that nothing will change.

The Targetboard Project

targetboard

In our May edition of Anseo.net, I wrote about how I thought one could use Google Apps to support a collaborative Mental Maths project using Targetboards.   I launched Targetboard.net and tried to drum up as much support for the project as possible before we began on June 7th.

Thanks to the support of mailing lists such as CESI and DICTAT and from the many retweets of my Twitter friends, over 50 schools signed up for the project from all parts of the country.  I had no idea whether Google Docs could support that many people collaborating at once but I lived in hope.

On June 7th at about 9:30am, I logged on to my Google account and started up the slideshow where the Targetboard would appear at 10am.  I was heartened to see two schools already logged in.  By the time it reached the magic hour, there were 7 schools frantically typing solutions to reach 20 in the five minute session.  I intermittently sent words of encouragement to the participants and the five minutes came and went incredibly quickly.

Even more schools logged in on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.  It was brilliant to see the number of solutions gushing down the screen.  Some schools took on personal challenges of using all 9 numbers in the grid to solve the target number.  Some schools learned some tricks to get their answers in more quickly – copy and pasting a list of answers proved quite popular!  However, overall the schools seemed to get a great buzz from mental maths.  The tiny competitive streak involved in the exercise gave huge motivation.  And the prize?  Nothing. The only thing that was up for grabs was the glory of being the school to have the most unique solutions to the targetboard.

I was lucky enough to sit in a classroom where the Targetboard was going on in my school.  The classroom teacher was working with her pupils and the atmosphere in the room from everybody was electrifying.  All sorts of emotions were on show – excitement, panic and pride.  The conversations were super and the collaboration between everyone in the room was brilliant.

The teacher commented upon the democratisation the project had on her class.  Children all felt equal. They were able to work at their own level and they were able to succeed in some way at the board. Some children became pseudo-heroes for part of the week such was their talent for spotting solutions.

On my part, moderating the project proved a little more difficult that first anticipated.  While watching the project and giving words of encouragement during the project was easy, collating the results each day was time consuming and not as easy as I’d hoped.

The main thing I didn’t realise was that Google App’s sidebar for discussions is written in Flash, which means I couldn’t copy and paste the answers into a separate document to delete duplicate answers and sort them into an easy way to read them.  Unfortunately, I had to manually go through each answer and check that no one else had done the same.  Thankfully the number of participants was low enough to do this within an hour.  However, obviously this would not be something I could do everyday.

To end the project, all participants were sent web badges to thank them for their participation.  An email went out to thank them for their support and a wish for the project to happen again, perhaps during Maths Week 2012.

So what next for Targetboard?  I do hope that we can do the project again some time.  If it were to be done on a larger scale, I guess we would have to build a more automated program, which could give instant feedback at the end without the need for manually compiling the solutions.  In the meantime, seeing as I bought the domain, I might as well get some use out of it!  I’m going to expand its use from just Maths Targetboards to other grid-type mental starters in subjects such as English and Irish.

As I stated near the beginning of the article, projects like these rely completely on the goodwill of friends, colleagues and various supportive organisations.  Projects like these have no commercial value but have potentially huge educational value and thus have no budget.  I’d like to once again thank anyone who tweeted about the project, the schools who linked to the web site from their own, the CESI and DICTAT mailing lists for allowing me to publicise the event and of course all the children who gave up their time everyday for a week to ready, steady, think.

Review: Classroom Art and Crafts (Prim-Ed)

caac

When I first saw this book, a feeling of dread came over me.  Art and crafts brings me back to how art used to be taught in primary schools – lots of paper plates, templates and 30 identical pieces of work stuck to a wall – no creativity or individuality.  Had the author called this book – “Early Learning Skills through Craft”, I probably would have approached the review differently because while this book helps children learn some basic early learning skills, it does not help children learn any visual arts.

Essentially this book contains about a year’s worth of cutting and gluing activities, which could probably be then used for other subjects.  For example, a lot of the activities involve cutting out a shape then sticking something on it.  For example, there’s a page which lets kids make a Mother’s Day card.  Once the children have glued and coloured in all the bits and pieces, they can write an individual message in it.

There isn’t really any activity that stands out as interesting and it’s really up to the teacher to make the activities educational once the craft work is done.

I think this book would probably suit a rainy day activity or in conjunction with a lesson the teacher plans herself.  In fact, if the book had have suggested curriculum activities to do with the craft exercises, it would have been a much better book.  I’m quite shocked that the book purports to support any curriculum aims from the Visual Arts curriculum.

It’s very difficult to find a commercial book that supports the primary curriculum.  Similarly before “Ceol”, there was little in the way of music programmes that supported the music curriculum.  There are a few decent art books out there but usually they’re found in the shops of art galleries rather than school book shops.  However, they usually just focus on one strand or one skill.  Whoever invents the Visual Arts version of “Ceol” may become a very rich person indeed.  Unforunately, it isn’t the author of this particular book.

Classroom Art and Craft is available from Prim-Ed at a cost of €24.95.