Time to retire the clock?
We’re constantly being told that the mathematics curriculum must represent real life situations. I completely agree with this and as we’re living in a digital age, it’s never been more important.
The maths curriculum in Ireland has managed to sway us into the world of decimalisation. We don’t talk to children about inches, feet, pounds or stones anymore in school though they might hear them from their American and British counterparts. Most recently we stopped talking about the other pounds and moved swiftly onto Euros without much effort.
However, no one has mentioned teaching time.
Before I begin, I’m not going to argue (yet) that we should scrap teaching time the way we currently do. However, let’s start by asking the question of where we see digital clocks?
Within a minute, you’ll probably come up with several answers: mobile phones, DVD players, ovens, wrist watches, alarms, alarm clocks, pedometers, stopwatches, etc. Now, try the same for an analogue clock.
By Jon Michael (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons
Was this your first thought?
Aside from iconic buildings and Vladamir Putin’s watch collection, there’s very little left that analogue clocks are used for. However, the emphasis on teaching time at primary school level is on this very type of clock.
Many will argue of the clock’s aesthetic value or that it is “easier” to learn than a digital clock (due to numbers only going up to 12 rather than 59). Many will argue that the analogue clock also feeds into other strands of the curriculum such as angles or times tables. However, wouldn’t it be more relevant to teach the digital clock first, i.e. 1:00 is one o’clock, 2:00 is two o’clock and so on. As children get older, we can convert between digital and analogue starting with the digital rather than the other way around. We can add in am and pm then 24 hour time later.
While I’m pretty sure the analogue clock isn’t going to go away completely in my lifetime, its role has certainly depleted in the last 10 years. Should the Irish curriculum start planning its retirement by lessening its importance? Do you ever see a day where the analogue clock will be no more? Is this your vision of Big Ben in the future?
-
Ralph
-
http://www.neteffects.com.au/ IT Support
-
http://twitter.com/lukejr Luke
-
simonmlewis
-
Gráinne Treanor
-
simonmlewis
-
-
Blackstairs
-
simonmlewis
-
-
John L
-
simonmlewis
-
One of the benefits of an analogue clock is in relation to understanding modulo arithmetic – although I suspect that isn’t part of the primary school curriculum! Modulo arithmetic comes up quite a bit when programming – most programming languages have modulo operators. So if the concepts underlying an analogue clock are taught well they open have wider benefits.
I don’t think analogue clock should be disregarded. It can be off good use to students in the near future and I think old teaching methods should not be thrown away but instead develop it into a more useful and conventional teaching method.
An old analogue clock is a very good way to teach angles and fractions.
Thanks for the comments so far. However, apart from using it to teach other mathematical concepts, what’s the point of the analogue clock anymore?
My 7 year old son has a watch. It is analogue. So is mine. I think both are necessary and, given that most people still seem to “talk” analogue (as in “it’s half four, quarter past 3, etc.), I don’t think the emphasis is misplaced. When I was at school learning the time, it was all analogue, but digital watches became popular a few years later. I got one for my 11th birthday and had no problem learning it.
-
Thanks for the comment. However hasn’t time moved on and children are more familiar with digital time? I’m not in favour of scrapping analogue, moreso I’m advocating placing more emphasis on digital in schools
Time is an opportunity to work outside of base 10…….. a journey into deeper mathematics…… regardless……… both are worthy of time ……….. digital being more widespread………. we have plenty of pruning to do before we get to the ‘analogue’ clock.
-
Base 12 is an interesting concept but do we need it at primary level?
I’d hate to see that day. I find I can tell the time quicker from an analogue watch. Just a glance at a clock face and I know what time it is (without having to do the “big hand is pointing to 6, little hand …” thing), whereas with a digital time, it’s all just numbers and I need to concentrate to think “2:46, that’s just after quarter to 3″. I know others who are the opposite, who have to mentally convert a real time to the digital representation to get a feel for what time of the day it is.
-
Thanks for the comment. I think we all are adverse to change. For example when we moved from to the decimal system in the 1970s, I’m sure there was a similar outcry. However, people got used to it and there are already 2 generations that have no idea what a guinea is.











